Ten occupied floors today. The model says fewer is enough.
SEAT THE BUILDING
Click any floor to zoom in — hover a desk for its team
ALTERNATIVES — HOW THE OTHER PACKAGES RANK
READING RULES
Every desk drawn sits inside a real room of its floor — walls from the measured plans; M-1 from the June 2026 survey drawing.
Gold-washed plates are released floors — nobody is seated there.
Team colours group business families; hover for the exact team and headcount.
Hatched grey areas are not office space; the clear band around the central core is circulation.
STANDING CONSTRAINTS THE OPTIMISER RESPECTS
Client-facing floors (RDC, M+1, M+9) are never released.
Regulated teams keep segregated, closable areas wherever they land.
Director-office counts follow the study's −30% / −50% reduction programme.
OPEN FLAGS TO SETTLE WITH THE CLIENT
The physical desk inventory varies by source (1,014 vs 1,075); per the client's instruction the counts here follow the Excel seat plan as the reference dataset.
The −30%/−50% director-office reductions are assumptions to validate floor-by-floor, not commitments.
Only full floors are releasable in this model. The partial-release units still pending the client's confirmation — the M+2 office zone excluding the canteen and the RDC Maestro wing — are not modelled; if confirmed, they need their own sub-floor pricing.
Deep packages (four to eight floors) fall back to a generic team allocation that may split a team beyond the client's two-floor rule — the per-team floor limits are not enforced in that fallback. The certified two- and three-floor packages, including the recommendation, are unaffected.
M+9 carries no meeting rooms in our room graph — a data gap in the source plans, not a modelling choice. We flag it rather than invent rooms; confirm M+9's meeting inventory before relying on its conversion figures.
€ unit rates are working placeholders until the PM prices the macro-actions.